Harvey, Bret, whatever. They’re all just intellectual cowards who hold exactly the same positions for exactly the same reason… while publicly deploring identity politics for Americans, Europeans, and soon, Han Chinese.
Stefan Molyneux@StefanMolyneux
From 800 BC to 1950 AD, 97{f58ffdc504f80bac68191b5fd37702d6450abd7e1b4a7df1cf9b5dab55667e79} of the world’s scientific advancements occurred in Europe and North America.98{f58ffdc504f80bac68191b5fd37702d6450abd7e1b4a7df1cf9b5dab55667e79} of the significant figures were male.
No white males, no modern world.
Fact.
I’m grateful.
Are you?
End the hate.
Aspire to admire, whatever the race.
Bret Weinstein@BretWeinsteinThis is a modern creation myth, delivered as if it were an analysis. It is as inaccurate and self-serving the intersectionalist’s claim that all disparities arise from oppression. Those pushing these stories persuade through flattery. Don’t be fooled. Don’t take the bait.Lauren Southern@Lauren_SouthernDon’t take the bait? How about have a productive debate and convince people of your position. I’d love to hear this discussion! I’m sure @RubinReport or someone…Bret Weinstein@BretWeinstein
Not interested in debating it. Here’s why: @StefanMolyneux is not stupid, but his stated position is. That suggests his purpose is not an analytical one.The logic is straightforward. His position is nuts. But he might well advance his agenda, and I want no part of that.Stefan Molyneux@StefanMolyneux
Can’t find an argument anywhere here, can you? People should just be honest and admit that they are afraid to discuss the scientific reality of human biodiversity because it might get them in trouble. That’s what Jordan Peterson did.Stefan Molyneux@StefanMolyneux
The “intellectual dark web” is well-paid to keep certain essential facts at bay
What, precisely, is nuts and stupid about Stefan’s statement? To observe the fact that 97 percent of the world’s scientific advancements before 1950 occurred in Europe and North America? To observe the fact that 98 percent of the significant figures involved were men? These are either facts and therefore true or false assertions. Or are we to take this as evidence that Weinstein now publicly accepts Jordan Peterson’s contention that facts are not necessarily true?
The Ineffectual Dork Weasels are cowardly fourth-rate academics and talking heads who have been appointed to be gatekeepers for the Right by the New York Times and are being propped up by the global Satanists in order to try to slow down the growing trend towards nationalism and Christianity in the West.
They are going to fail abysmally due to their cowardice, as Ben Shapiro has run from debates with me and Milo, Jordan Peterson has run from debates with Marxists despite publicly claiming that Marxists are afraid to debate him, and now Bret Weinstein is running away from debate with Stefan Molyneux. Everyone can see the pattern. They have literally no ability to defend their own positions and little more capacity for offering substantive criticism of anything except a nebulous bogeyman of “the Radical Left” that they somehow cannot define correctly.
There is a very good reason these ineffectual losers only talk to each other, as talking to anyone who is both honest and capable of seeing through them will expose them almost instantly. They can’t afford to engage with Stefan, or Milo, or me, because they know perfectly well that their positions are false and they know that we know their positions are false too.
All that anyone needs to do to publicly discredit these weasels is precisely what I’ve done in Jordanetics, which is to quote their own words extensively and show people exactly what they are saying in the correct context. Even their tweets, when compared over time, are damning, because their core positions are intrinsically hypocritical, incoherent, and deceptive.