I’ve said it before. I’ll say it again. And each time, more people recognize the truth in the statement. Calling a feminist a feminazi is an insult to the National Socialist German Workers Party:
Florida legislators considering a bill to require abortionists to provide medical care to an infant who survives an abortion were shocked during a committee hearing this week when a Planned Parenthood official endorsed a right to post-birth abortion. Alisa LaPolt Snow, the lobbyist representing the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, testified that her organization believes the decision to kill an infant who survives a failed abortion should be left up to the woman seeking an abortion and her abortion doctor….
“If a baby is born on a table as a result of a botched abortion,
what would Planned Parenthood want to have happen to that child that is
struggling for life?”“We believe that any decision that’s made should be left up to the
woman, her family, and the physician,” said Planned Parenthood lobbyist
Snow.
This is what the feminist’s vaunted concept of equality means. This is what it has always meant: the legal protection of a woman from all and any consequences of her actions. This includes a woman’s ability to break any contract at will, to steal from anyone as she pleases, and murder even the most innocent without having to even hear a whisper of protest to make her uncomfortable. Feminists are objectively worse than Nazis. They are demonstrably worse than Fascists. They are provably worse than Communists. Their insane ideology has a higher body count than any of those three evil ideologies and comes with more costly, less sustainable societal consequences.
Civilization has always depended upon the collaborative effort of men and women to restrain the darker and more chaotic aspects of women’s nature. Women are more important to the sustainability of a society, which is why a society that can survive the bad behavior of its young males cannot survive similarly bad behavior on the part of its young females.
Islamic society is one example of the result of the civilizational burden falling upon men alone. It isn’t ideal, but it is observably preferable, and observably more sustainable, than the catastrophic state in which Western society presently finds itself. Victorian expat society appears to be about as close to leaving the civilizational burden in women’s hands as I’ve been able to determine. Even that is a vastly more functional system. But now, both men and women alike have washed their hands of the burden and we are seeing the results of hypergamy and solipsism run amok.
There are no limits. That is the key. Or rather, there are no INTERNAL limits to them, and so in the absence of external ones being imposed, there are no limits. “Women’s rights” requires nothing less than sacrificing every other right that Western civilization has achieved, including the right to life itself. Only the sub-civilizational, the nihilistic, and the stupidly short-sighted can support them.
This isn’t a theoretical observation. This isn’t mindless mysogyny. This is simply called “paying attention” to the ongoing societal collapse and its sources. The Doctor Panglosses of the various statistics departments are already openly willing to admit to a “triple-dip recession.” Deposit heists of up to 80 percent are being openly discussed. College enrollments, even those funded entirely by debt, have peaked. The nation is on the verge of becoming a genetically Third World one. We are rapidly approaching a fifth year of debt deflation/disinflation. The government is arming and asserting its right to assassinate anyone.
And you think everything is fine? You think this is going to last? You think this even has the possibility of continuing in the intermediate term?