SFWA Platform: the first five points

As some of you already know, I have declared myself to be a candidate for the SFWA president in the next election, which takes place this spring.  Here are the first five points of my platform; I’m interested in any ideas for improving them:

  1. SPLIT THE NEBULA AWARDS: Science
    fiction is not fantasy. Fantasy is not science fiction. I propose
    doubling the number of Nebula Awards, and presenting awards for Best
    Novel, Best Novella, Best Novellette, Best Short Story, and Best
    Script in two categories, Science Fiction and Fantasy.
  2. AWARD A CASH PRIZE FOR BOTH BEST
    NOVEL AWARDS: A $5,000 prize will be awarded to the winner of Best
    Novel:Science Fiction as well as to the winner of Best
    Novel:Fantasy. The long term goal will be to work towards making
    the winning of a Nebula a more prestigious and financially valuable
    event than winning the Man Booker Prize.
  3. EXPAND THE MEMBERSHIP: The right
    to SFWA membership will be granted to all self-published and small
    press-published authors who have sold more than a specified number
    of ebooks to be determined, eligibility number to be confirmed via
    official Amazon report. It will also be granted to all SF/F-related
    computer game lead designers, senior designers, and writers with
    primary credits on two or more SF/F-related games.
  4. ELIMINATE THE APPEARANCE OF
    CORRUPTION IN THE AWARD PROCESS: Closing the nomination process to
    the membership and the public made the appearance of corruption
    worse, not better. Reducing the number of recommendations to reduce
    logrolling was a good idea, hiding the results from the membership
    created more harm than good.
  5. EMPOWERING THE NEBULA JURIES: The
    most prestigious and lucrative literary prizes are awarded by
    juries. The Nebulas should be no different if they are to attain
    equal prestige. I am entirely open to a debate about the best way
    to ensure jury integrity, but my initial thought is to randomly
    select the juries from the membership, with jurors barred from
    voting for works published by their publishers. In situations where
    the latter bar would lead to an obvious injustice being done, the
    SFWA President and Vice-President would have the ability to release
    a juror from the bar on a case-by-case basis if they both agreed
    such an act was justified by the quality of the work in question.