SD doesn’t disappoint:
I read worldnetdaily every day and will occasionally read your articles, although I find you pompous and long winded and not to mention a little scary looking ( are you a skinhead by the way?) As a Christian I completely disagree with your subtle condoning of polygamy, this is apparently what you secretly desire for your life! Yes Abraham had several wives, but against God’s commands. God created one man and one woman and wished that they be together joined in unity as one. You and your ilk are the reason that so many non Christians hate Christianity, because they see a nation that will force women into a Taliban type situation where women are used only for child rearing purposes. When God Created Eve, he did not say this is Eve, mother of your children, he said this is your mate taken out of your side to stand equal and one with you. I will no longer suffer through your articles.
SD can read or not read, as she wishes, but she shouldn’t be so predictably ridiculous. Does she honestly believe every commentator who argued that the Iraqi invasion did so because he wanted to shoot himself some Ayrabs? This is an issue that is coming down the pike thanks to the Supreme Court. Therefore, it bears consideration whether SD wants to think about it or not.
I’m curious to know how those taking Biblical exception to today’s column explain God telling one of the minor prophets – Habbakuk? – to take more than one wife.
Not to mention the fact that that whole monogamous Eve thing worked out just as God planned, right? I mean, constructing an argument for God’s ideal plan based on The Fall strikes me as more than a little bizarre. Genesis, too, would appear to illustrate that the Biblical ideal is to remain unmarried, so those who would base legislation on it should probably consider joining the Sisterhood in working towards the abolishment of marriage.
Only a little scary-looking? Hmmmm… how very disappointing. I knew I should have filed my teeth.