Tag: conspiracy

It’s Just a Joke

And a coincidence, right? You know Feynman proved everything is just coincidence and confirmation bias, right, anon?

A now-deleted X account appears to have had prior knowledge of the brutal assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk and subsequently posted a threatening date for President Donald Trump.
Trump was shot during an outdoor speech in Pennsylvania on July 13, 2024.

The account, @TallyHallAlbum, posted an eerily specific “joke” on September 3, declaring it would be “funny if someone like Charlie Kirk got shot on September 10th LMAO.”

Just days after the tragedy, the user followed up with a cryptic reply: “did i” – and then escalated the threat by posting “Donald Trump. December 14th.” before scrubbing the entire profile from existence.

The question this raises is pretty obvious. Which Donald Trump would that be?

DISCUSS ON SG

Remember, Everything is Fake

The “Russian drone attack” on Poland was a comical attempt at a false flag.

The incident was obviously very strange because, while a few errant Russian drones had maybe fallen over other countries here and there—after likely being jammed off their course—this has never happened in such a large scale. This heavily suggests something very fishy, in the way of either a false flag or a coordinated campaign; that is to say, something like an Israeli Stux-net or “pager” operation where a large amount of Russian drones are “tampered with” before hand, whether that’s by digital infection of firmware via virus, or something else.

There were several signs pointing to the ‘false flag’ explanation, for instance a photo of a Russian drone that landed on a Polish “chicken coop” that shows the drone taped together with literal duct tape. This is important because Ukraine was known to have been collecting previously-downed Russian drones in order to “creatively” reuse them for such a purpose. So a previously-destroyed or damaged drone could perhaps need some “work” to make it look whole for the ‘presentation’.

Additionally, Polish homes presented as “destroyed” by Russian drones were outed by citizens as houses that were damaged long ago by natural disasters.

The USA is much better at staging false events because it’s been doing so for much longer than most of other countries; since at least 1898 and the “Remember the Maine” false flag that was used to justify the Spanish-American War.

After reading a newspaper story in 1974 about the sinking of the Maine, Admiral Hyman G. Rickover decided to reexamine the issue. He recruited historians, archivists, and two Navy experts on ship design: Robert S. Price, a research physicist at the Naval Surface Weapons Center at White Oak, Maryland, and Ib S. Hansen, assistant for design applications in the Structures Department at the David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center at Cabin John, Maryland. Among Price’s Navy projects had been an analysis of the wreckage of the nuclear-propelled submarine Scorpion (SSN-589), which was lost in May 1968.

The Hansen-Price analysis, as Rickover called it, was the heart of a short book published in 1976. The 23-page analysis reached this conclusion: “We found no technical evidence . . . that an external explosion initiated the destruction of the Maine. The available evidence is consistent with an internal explosion alone. We therefore conclude that an internal source was the cause of the explosion. The most likely source was heat from a fire in a coal bunker adjacent to the 6-inch reserve magazine. However, since there is no way of proving this, other internal causes cannot be eliminated as possibilities.”

As far as the “confession” concerning what has been reported as Charlie Kirk’s murder goes, remember that Tyler Robinson isn’t even the first person to confess to shooting the Turning Point USA founder. Whatever the truth eventually turns out to be, remember, the one and only thing we know cannot be true right now is the Official Story as reported by the mainstream media.

DISCUSS ON SG

They Got the Patsy

Color me dubious. Color me very, very dubious indeed that the assassination of Charlie Kirk was committed by another lone gunman.

The suspect is Tyler Robinson, a 22-year-old man from Washington, Utah. The shooter confessed to his father that he was the perpetrator, CNN reported.

The man’s father then tipped off law enforcement and secured his son until officers arrived. Sources told CNN the individual was still being questioned as of Friday morning.

Trump said that ‘somebody who was very close’ to the suspect turned him in to police – referring to the tipster as the assassin’s ‘minister’ and ‘father’.

‘It was a minister who was involved with law enforcement… his good friend is a top U.S. Marshal – and they took it from there,’ Trump said, suggesting the suspect’s father told him it was time to turn themselves in.

Law enforcement will share more details about the suspect’s arrest later on Friday, the president said.

It’s always possible that the Official Story is true… but history suggests that just isn’t very likely.

UPDATE: Retired Green Beret Nate Cornacchia claims that whoever the FBI arrests as the shooter will likely be just a patsy in a much larger cover-up. He adds that the chances of the arrested individual actually being the real shooter are “slim to none.”

You don’t say…

UPDATE: In case you didn’t believe the “shooter” is just the patsy, now they’re reporting that he was a follower of Nick Fuentes. Now, I may not think much of Fuentes, but he’s the kind of guy who runs away from debates with the likes of Candace Owens and Charlie Kirk, he’s not the kind of guy who plots their destruction and neither are his followers.

DISCUSS ON SG

We Never Went to the Moon

As the Boomers die out, so too does the belief that the Apollo Moon landings were real.

The moon hoax theory was almost unheard of before the spread of Internet, and gained momentum with the development of YouTube, which allowed close inspection of the Apollo footage by anyone interested. Before that, individuals who had serious doubts had little means to share them and make their case convincing. One pioneer was Bill Kaysing, who broke the subject in 1976 with his self-published book We Never Went to the Moon: America’s Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle. He may be called a whistleblower, since he had been working for Rocketdyne, the company that designed and built the Apollo rockets. Then came Ralph René with his NASA Mooned America!, also self published.

Research gained depth and scope, and disbelief became epidemic around the 30th anniversary of Apollo 11, thanks in great part to British cinematographer David Percy, who co-authored the book Dark Moon with Mary Bennett, and directed the 3-hour documentary What Happened on the Moon? An Investigation into Apollo (2000), presented by Ronnie Stronge. It remains to this day greatly valuable for anyone willing to make an informed opinion.

Then there was the much shorter A Funny Thing Happened on the way to the Moon (2001), directed by Bart Sibrel, which brings in valuable insight into the historical context. Sibrel also went around challenging NASA astronauts to swear on the Bible, in front of the camera, that they did walk on the moon, and he compiled these sequences in Astronauts Gone Wild, together with more useful footages of embarrassingly awkward statements made by NASA astronauts who are supposed to have walked on the moon but sound hardly competent and consistent; Alan Bean from Apollo 12 learning from Sibrel that he went through the Van Allen radiation belt is a must-see.

Then, using materials from those films and other sources, came the groundbreaking TV documentary Did we land on the moon? (2001), directed by John Moffet for Fox TV. To my knowledge and judgment, this is still the best introduction to the arguments of the “moon hoax theorists”.

I don’t believe for one second that the Apollo missions went to the Moon and landed on it. It has all of the characteristics of a government-funded fraud, right down to the equivalent of the “training exercise” of the films made by Stanley Kubrick. There are obviously a whole host of flaws in the Official Story, but the one that finally converted me to a Moon Landing Denier was the “oh, we recorded over the telemetry tapes and then we lost them” excuse that was belatedly produced when skeptics wanted to analyze them.

It’s worth noting the background of NASA’s first administrator, T. Keith Glennan.

Born in Enderlin, North Dakota, the son of Richard and Margaret Glennan, he attended the University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire and then earned a degree in electrical engineering from the Sheffield Scientific School of Yale University in 1927, where he was a member of Chi Phi fraternity. Following graduation, he became associated with the newly developed sound motion picture industry, and later became assistant general service superintendent for Electrical Research Products Company, a subsidiary of Western Electric Company. During his career he was studio manager of Paramount Pictures, and Samuel Goldwyn Studios.

NASA was a Hollywood operation all along, from the very beginning. And while Ockham’s Razor is not perfectly reliable, it is a reasonable metric that tends to point toward the truth.

The reason Man has not been back to the Moon is because he never went in the first place.

DISCUSS ON SG

Wind-Up Toy Attack

A school shooter attacked Annunciation Catholic in Minneapolis this morning.

Two children are dead, ages 8 and 10, after a gunman opened fire at the Annunciation Catholic School during a morning Mass on the south side of Minneapolis, authorities said. Seventeen others, including 14 children, were injured in the mass shooting, police said.

That’s awful, obviously. Now let’s see if there are any signs it was a wind-up toy at work.

Agents with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives were some of the very first responders to the scene because they just happened to be in the area of the shooting, according to an ATF source in Minneapolis.

They “just happened to be in the area”.

Right.

Now let me guess, the shooter killed himself.

The suspect in the Minneapolis shooting died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound, according to three law enforcement officials familiar with the investigation… Police believe the suspect was a lone shooter in his 20s who died of a self-inflicted gunshot in the parking lot.

Right.

I suspect it won’t be long before we’re going to be informed that he was seeing a psychiatrist or was in some kind of therapy and was prescribed SSRIs.

How can these tragedies possibly be prevented? It’s just such a mystery.

Also… homeschool or die.

UPDATE: The suspect has been identified as Robin Westman, a transsexual Jew. Quelle surprise.

DISCUSS ON SG

Fake Trump Exit Incoming

I don’t know if you’ve noticed this lately, but a lot of shills are suddenly pushing the idea that Trump’s short, puffy hands are an indication that he’s in poor health and will die soon, even though the diagnosis of chronic venous insufficiency and its treatment was announced more than a month ago, on July 17th.

President Donald Trump underwent medical testing after he had been seen with deep bruises on his hand and swollen legs in recent days, and was diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday.

My opinion is that Clown World’s play of the double card is now deemed to have failed, and now they’re going to dispose of their puppet with the announcement that President Trump has died and JD Vance is succeeding him. This, I think, would be a belated attempt to force the white hats out in the open, presumably before they are prepared to make their case to the global public. It’s a move that smacks of desperation, but given how the balance of power has been gradually, but decisively, shifting toward Clown World’s enemies and away from their servants, it might be one of their last chances to escape the inevitable by overturning the table and trying to find some leverage in the chaos.

Now, for those of you who are binary thinkers, please just ignore all of this. I’m not interested in hearing your retarded attempts to declare “Vox believes this” or “Vox believes that” or “Vox is Q-tarded”. I’m a game designer, remember? I write 900-page fantasy novels with 9 different storylines running simultaneously. Unlike most people, I’m capable of following a logical line of thought all the way through to completion without getting attached to it or emotionally committing to a conclusion. I’m just looking at the observable facts, paying attention to reported events, and contemplating various possible explanations, always with the caveat that nothing reported by the media is ever what it seems.

But it is interesting to see that shills all over social media are suddenly hinting at Trump’s death by natural causes. They’re doing this for a reason. If you’ve got a better explanation, feel free to share it.

DISCUSS ON SG

Definitely Fake, Possibly Worse

Big Bear has a theory about Nick Fuentes:

A full breakdown of who Nick Fuentes is, who’s backing him and why. This is very detailed with clips of him describing all of my claims. The dude openly promotes pedophelia and honey pots his listeners. Over and over again.

I don’t think he’s a fed. It’s way way worse.

Now, I don’t pay enough attention to Nick Fuentes to have much of an opinion on him other than the fact that I know, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that he is a coward, he is a liar, and he is a manufactured entity who is propped up by inorganic means. Who manufactured him and who props him up, I do not know, because I realized he was irrelevant and intellectually unserious back in 2019 and therefore saw no reason to start paying attention to anything he said or did. A search of this blog will confirm that there are very, very few references to him to be found here, aside from a mention of his 2020 banning by YouTube and a 2023 reference to the obvious similarities between Fuentes and the failed attempt to make Jon Zherka a thing.

You may recall the list of signs that an individual is controlled opposition and his “popularity” is being manufactured for him by the mainstream media, as in the cases of Ben Shapiro, Jordan Peterson, Nick Fuentes, and Andrew Tate, just to name a few.

I will point out that one mistake commonly made by midwits is to assume that because A is attacking B, A cannot be in the employ of B. This assumption is fundamentally false, because everyone, on every side, is well-aware of the utility of being able to control the opposition. Hence the joke about never asking a “white nationalist” about the racial heritage of his significant other; it is safe to assume that most Internet Nazis are actually funded by AIPAC contributors in order to play the role of the over-the-top bad guys in order to provide the impetus for AIPAC’s endless campaign against anti-semitism.

This is Clown World, after all, where everything is literally fake and reliably gay.

But Owen’s instincts should not be ignored. Once he saw through the charade that is Jordan Peterson and understood the mechanism by which these frauds are manufactured and elevated, his natural ability to sniff out BS became applicable to the intellectual and ideological gatekeepers. I don’t know if he is correct about Fuentes being the puppet of an even darker group than the one to whom the Petersons and Shapiros are beholden, but if he is, we’ll eventually learn the truth.

One thing that separates both Big Bear and I from all the midwits who keep falling for these charlatans is that unlike them, we don’t listen for confirmation. It means nothing to either of us to hear that someone appears to agree with anything we say or with what we believe. What we listen for, what we pay attention to, are the anomalies. Because it’s always in the anomalies that the truth can ultimately be perceived.

Words are just words, and they mean less than nothing in the mouths of inversive liars to whom deceit is a virtue and fraud is a moral imperative. The only words that really matter are the Words of God, which informs us that we are to judge both men and their words by the fruit that they bear.

We are told that Nick Fuentes has 710k followers on X, which utterly dwarfs the 800 subscribers that Big Bear and I presently share on UATV. So I wonder, what fruit has been born of this massive following and the resources it implies?

I note that Nick Fuentes claimed to be “the most cancelled man” back in 2022, five years after I was banned from Twitter. I’m still banned. My wife is still banned. Fuentes has 709,900 followers there… And finally, the reason that I know he is a manufactured fraud is because manufactured frauds always run away from debate with me because they are not allowed to “platform” me.

Which, you will note, Nick Fuentes did, repeatedly, back in 2019. The problem is that I have always been, and will always be, far more relevant than the fraudulent little freak is, whether Owen is correct about him or not. It is an undeniable fact that more people around the world utilize the very words and ideas that I create than even know who he is. So if you’re a Nick Fuentes fan, remember that when challenged in the very manner he invited, he behaved exactly like Jordan Peterson and Ben Shapiro.

“I don’t want to debate him because it’s too boring, dude, it’s too boring. Everybody would think that would be exciting, but, I can tell you for a fact that there would be no entertainment value in debating somebody as boring and as slow as Vox Day. So the guy’s boring, and he’s irrelevant, you know, who’s watching the Darkstream? If he can pull more than 2000 viewers concurrent watching the Darkstream, maybe I’d consider him worth my time, but, I mean the guy’s a has-been, you could say he never was. You know, this is somebody who’s been floating around on the scene like writing books? And, what does he have to show for it? Infogalactic? A gay comic book? You know, all these like just stupid projects that don’t go anywhere.”

And in the event you’re dumb enough to believe that your binary thinking model is capable of addressing issues that intrinsically involve some elements of deception, please be advised that you should keep your irrelevant opinions to yourself.

DISCUSS ON SG

The “Brigitte” Macron Scandal Explodes

It’s becoming obvious that a disproportionate percentage of the Clown World elite has tranny spouses. Including, it would seem, the French president:

Poussard presents several pieces of documentary and photographic evidence in support of his claim that Brigitte Macron is transgender (specifically, that she was born male as Jean-Michel Trogneux, her brother’s name, and later assumed a female identity). Poussard points to Brigitte Macron’s physical appearance, such as broad shoulders, slim hips, and certain mannerisms (e.g., how she sits or walks), as indicators that she was born male. But it is the photographic evidence and the lack of photographic evidence that seals the case. Poussard shows that there are no accessible photos of a young Brigitte, with former schools refusing to release images and town halls reluctant to share birth certificates. Poussard would be a fool to make this claim if “Brigitte” could produce the photos from all of her school yearbooks, photos of her pregnant, photos of her playing with her alleged children. The Macrons have steadfastly refused to release what would be a powerful refutation and a financial death sentence for Poussard.

But then there is this photo:

Poussard used facial-recognition software to evaluate a number of photos. This one above shows Jean-Michel Trogneux, allegedly Brigitte’s brother, when he was 18. Hell, you don’t even need software to see the resemblance.

Poussard also highlights a lack of documented accounts for Jean-Michel Trogneux in some family records, despite his appearance in family photos and references (e.g., at Brigitte’s 1974 wedding), implying identity theft or fabrication.

It would seem a simple matter to simply have this missing brother of “Brigitte” come forward and appear with his sister. And surely there would be photographs of them together at “her” wedding, would there not? Except, apparently, there aren’t. I find it particularly amusing that he’s stuck with the same style of eyeglasses over the years. Change your sex? Sure. But glasses… yeah, you’ve got to stick with what works for your facial features.

Let’s be clear. Not only are all of these crazy “conspiracy theories” about the Clown World elite more or less true, I’ll bet they don’t even cover the half of it. I am absolutely confident that if and when the truth comes out, it’s going to be a lot weirder than “a gay guy pretended to be a woman in order to marry a guy half his age at a time when gay marriage was illegal”. Forget conspiracy theory, that doesn’t sound any more outrageous than the plot of a Shakespeare comedy.

DISCUSS ON SG

More Talk Talk

These jokers need to stop promising and posturing and actually arresting people and putting these “shocking matters” out in public, or they can just shut up and go away.

Embattled FBI deputy director Dan Bongino revealed he has discovered matters that have ‘shocked me down to my core’ during his time in office.

Bongino shared a cryptic message to his social media in which he vowed to uncover ‘the truth’ amid mounting criticism of his handling of the Epstein files.

He added: ‘We cannot run a Republic like this. I’ll never be the same after learning what I’ve learned.

‘We are going to conduct these righteous and proper investigations by the book and in accordance with the law. We are going to get the answers WE ALL DESERVE.

‘As with any investigation, I cannot predict where it will land, but I can promise you an honest and dignified effort at truth. Not “my truth,” or “your truth,” but THE TRUTH.’

Bongino alluded in his statement to recent discoveries surrounding government corruption and weaponization.

He did not provide a timeline for when the general public might learn about what he is talking about, adding that ‘things are happening’.

No one falls for the “we can’t talk because we’re investigating” line anymore. The law doesn’t punish celebrities and politicians anyhow, so it’s not a credible excuse. And the truth is certain defense against defamation.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Classicist Conspiracy

The more deeply one looks into the facts related to the mainstream historian’s version of the official Shakespeare story, the more obviously implausible it becomes.

In my debate with classicist Philip Womack, he pushed the orthodox view detailed above that the apocryphal plays and bad quartos were all the result of some form of piracy. And I responded with something like the following:

Can you not tell how anti-Strafordian you sound here? You think the majority of plays attributed to William Shakespeare while he was alive and up till 1621 are fraudulent and the result of corruption (this is counting all apocryphal plays and bad quartos) despite the fact that:

  • Shakespeare never protested about his name falsely being used.
  • Shakespeare and company, who performed all these plays, never complained about their illicit procurement and unauthorized publication.
  • No one else ever mentioned it at the time or for decades afterward.
  • The real authors of the apocryphal plays never demanded proper credit.
  • None of the dozens of printers or publishers were ever punished for it.
  • These nefarious printers and publishers ended up pulling off a ruse that fooled the world for a century—as scholars, editors, etc. were still referring to “Yorkshire Tragedy” and “London Prodigal” as Shakespeare’s into the 18th century.
  • No other playwright of the Shakespeare era was similarly victimized. In fact, no other living writer in all of English history had a similar misattribution occur to him just once—let alone twelve times!

Expanding on the last point above, there is no known case in history in which an English printer or publisher has ever purposefully misattributed a single work (like a play, essay, or novel) to a single, living author whom they knew had nothing to do with the work. Why is that? Well, because the printer and publisher would know that the credited author would complain—and so too would the wronged author whose work had been stolen and assigned to someone else. In fact, as I have shown, there also may not even be an indisputable example of such a deliberate misattribution occurring to a dead author.

There’s just no rational reason to doubt Shakespeare’s authorship of the quartos attributed to him—and no one at the time, or for even a century afterward, ever doubted those title pages either.

As usual, the mainstream inverts the actual situation. It’s not those who are revising the official history on the basis of the available facts who are the conspiracy theorists, it’s the classicists who are defending their unsupportable dogma by concocting a whole series of conspiratorial explanations.

DISCUSS ON SG