Tag: conspiracy

That’s Not the Secret

I tend to doubt that Melinda Gates was surprised by, or even particularly upset by, Bill Gates cheating on her. The way she reacted when she suddenly announced she was divorcing him tends to suggest that whatever secret Jeffrey Epstein was holding over Bill Gates’s head, it probably wasn’t just a simple case of adultery:

Bill Gates admitted cheating on his ex-wife, Melinda, and claimed Jeffrey Epstein tried to weaponize the affairs against him during a bombshell congressional grilling on Wednesday. The Microsoft founder, 70, denied any wrongdoing but claimed the pedophile wielded the ‘painful’ secrets in a bid to strong-arm him back into the friendship after he cut it off.

‘I learned Epstein had become aware of sensitive information about my personal life, including the fact that I had been unfaithful in my marriage. These affairs had nothing to do with my interactions with Epstein, but they were painful for my family,’ Gates said, according to his prepared statement to the House Oversight Committee.

Gates struck up a relationship with Epstein in 2011 after the financier promised he could help raise billions of dollars for global public health initiatives. Epstein was already a registered sex offender, having pleaded guilty in Florida three years earlier to soliciting prostitution from a minor.

‘I recall being aware that Epstein had faced prior legal issues, but I did not fully understand the extent of the crimes he committed. I accepted the introduction without applying the scrutiny I should have,’ Gates told lawmakers on Capitol Hill.

He claimed his interactions with the pedophile were ‘limited’ and testified that he cut off all contact in 2014.

Counting down to someone finding post-2014 emails between Gates and Epstein…

DISCUSS ON SG

What if it Wasn’t Libel

What’s done in the dark will be brought to the light:

Epstein case revelations: U.S. Congresswoman Lauren Boebert stunned Newsmax after reviewing the unredacted Epstein documents:

“It’s far darker than anyone could have imagined: emails about torture, constant references to ‘consumption,’ a place literally called the ‘Cannibal Restaurant,’ and code words like ‘jerky’ and ‘human meat’ being tossed around as if it were nothing.”

Yes. She directly asked whether we are dealing with cannibalism. With literal human consumption.

This is no longer some fringe theory. A sitting member of Congress is openly saying what no one else dares to say: these monsters not only abused and trafficked children — they may have eaten them as well.

I suspect we are soon going to learn why a certain “libel” not only wasn’t ever a libel, but explains why those to whom it historically applied are persona non grata in dozens of countries to this day. And I suspect it’s going to go deeper, darker, and wider than anyone, including me, really wants to imagine, in the same way that I correctly anticipated what would be found around the ziggurats of Central America.

It’s important to keep in mind there are both spiritual and material elements to this. But anyone who has ever condemned groups like the Inquisitions, the Romans, and the Conquistadors should be considered suspect, because groups like that have been the historical instruments of rooting out and eliminating the ancient evils preying upon Man.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Finding in the Folio

Dennis McCarthy offers further proof that Ben Jonson, and a number of his colleagues, knew very well that Thomas North was the original author of most of the Shakespeare plays.

As we shall see in this article, Jonson’s celebrated ode contains a shocking secret—a dead giveaway to the true origin of the canon. In other words, the answer to the most significant literary question in history—who was the original author of Shakespeare’s plays?—has been sitting prominently in the front of the First Folio for the last 400 years. Jonson was not being remotely subtle…

As I frequently point out with no hyperbole: the second greatest plagiarist in history has not borrowed half as much, perhaps not one-tenth as much, from another writer as Shakespeare has from North.

Shakespeare never had a “witty friend” help him write plays? Not only did North aid him in the chore; scholars involved in authorship studies point to at least half a dozen plays—1 Henry VI, Pericles, Two Noble Kinsmen, Macbeth, Henry VIII, for instance—that were collaborations. All of Digges’s counter-claims are false.

In brief, Jonson, who knew the North-Shakespeare story and had scoffed at Shakespeare before, saw the poem he would write for the First Folio as an opportunity to memorialize his view of Shakespeare. Of course, he knew he couldn’t explicitly attack Shakespeare—as it would never be allowed in the front of a collection meant for fans of the Stratford dramatist. Shakespeare was the only one then known to London playgoers—and his name and reputation helped ensure the First Folio would be a successful publishing venture.

But even Jonson’s title clues you in: “To the Memory of My Beloved the Author Master William Shakespeare, and What He Hath Left Us.” It doesn’t refer to what Shakespeare wrote or created—but what he hath left us. And as Digges and Dryden both knew, the poem does not really commend Shakespeare; rather it stands as a sobering rebuttal to the idolatry that the volume would arouse. And in the middle of this ode, the poet identifies the playwright who was the true, original author of Shakespeare’s plays. Jonson’s “tribute” to Shakespeare was his last act of vengeance, a carefully framed reprise of his previous denunciations of the crow cum swan. And it is one of the last pieces in the puzzle that exposes North as the true genius behind the Shakespeare canon.

It’s interesting to see how long ago writers were having to skirt the mainstream narrative in order to avoid getting canceled.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Great Fiction of 1989

It’s not hard to understand why the Chinese have absolutely no trust of Clown World or its pet media once one learns the truth of Tiananmen Square. And it does tend to call other Western media reports of China into question.

The US reportedly contacted key leaders among the protesting students and made them an offer—don’t wind down, go harder on the protesting and we’ll give you US passports, CIA-run safe passage out of China, a new home in the richest country in the world, and enrolment in top US universities—Harvard, Princeton, Columbia. Now that was an offer hard to refuse.

In late May, student leader Chai Ling gave her infamously puzzling interview/ talk, where she seemed to predict a Tiananman Square massacre in which she would die. She said she was speaking her last words, as there would be “a massacre which would spill blood like a river through Tiananmen Square” – but she also included the information that she “would not be there” as her new plan was to move to the United States to study there! Years later, she wrote that her remarkable prediction of a coming violent crackdown which would lead to a Tiananmen Square massacre was something she had heard from Li Lu, not her own forecast.

Another person in the leading student group, Kong Qingdong, later recalled how he how he had come across undergraduates using a mimeograph machine to makes copies of personal documents, to give to the US Embassy in return for passports. Two of the top leaders, Chai Ling and Feng Congde, were getting them, he was told by fellow undergraduates.

Kong refused to join the rush to take US passports, saying that the protest was all about making China a better place.
Kong angrily declined to join them. He felt the protests were about standing up for China and enabling socialist modernization for the people—not grabbing passports handed out by a hostile foreign power.

Something else was troubling Kong, which he found hard to articulate. He later said: “I wasn’t fond of the way the forceful way the government spoke. But what they were actually saying was: ‘This is a complex situation. There are certain forces behind the scenes, sowing discord.’ This was the truth.”

Think about that line of agreement between the students and the government: There are certain forces behind the scenes, sowing discord. In other words, some protesters as well as the government knew what was really happening under the surface. But if things were calming down, what changed? How did violence break out? Kong’s answer to that question was cryptic. “When we were little, we watched movies like Guerrillas Sweep The Plain,” he said.

That answer would have meant nothing to a western audience—but it was clear to many Chinese. This was a reference to a classic 1955 Chinese movie in which there are tensions between two groups. They have disagreements but don’t fight. Suddenly, a hidden third body, the Eighth Army, opens fire at both sides and then quickly hides, triggering bloodshed.

And that is what happened. Soldiers and students were sharing food. But on June 3, mysterious thugs, some of whom were said to be from ethnic minorities, triggered a fight in Mu Xi Di, in the west of the city, attacking army buses with petrol bombs and setting them alight, burning the occupants to death. The perpetrators were never found.

Soldiers who managed to escape the burning buses were beaten to death. Other military men arrived and chaotic fighting broke out, with scores of deaths.

This was five kilometers away from Tiananmen Square.

At the Square, in the early hours of June 4, soldiers arrived and called on students to leave. Student leader Feng Congde worked to gauge protesters’ opinions, and concluded that the majority wanted to vacate the space. “So I announced the decision to leave,” he said. Students left peacefully.

Violence did break out, not in the square, but in the streets around it.

One witness, Larry Wortzel, watched protesters attack a military vehicle and noted how well it was organized—someone had definitely trained them. “This was clearly a tactic rehearsed and even practiced among the demonstrators, since it was used in the same way in separate places around the city,” he wrote.

“All verified eyewitness accounts say that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully,” said the Washington Post’s Jay Mathews.

Now this is where it gets strange. The next day, a very different story appeared from a few foreign embassies saying that 10,000 people had been killed. This tale said the students in the square had not left. They had stayed and been massacred with machine guns, their bodies pushed into piles with bulldozers, and then incinerated by troops with flamethrowers. This gruesome horror story, supported by no evidence at all, is now viewed by eastern and western historians as entirely fictional.

DISCUSS ON SG

Report: Iran Has Nukes

81 years of global fear, and 40+ years of neocon warnings, threats, and hissy fits may have just gone up in smoke during a single telephone call:

I have not been given access to NSA Sigint, but I have confirmed that the phone call last week between Iranian President Pezeshkian and Pakistani Prime Minister Shariff was over a non-secure line. I am reliably informed that this was done deliberately by the Iranians and Pakistanis — i.e., the Iranians and Pakistanis were counting on the Americans and the Israelis to be listening in. The key part of the conversation between Pezeshkian and Shariff was this:

President Masoud Pezeshkian communicated a formally structured, three-step strategic ultimatum if US strikes continued:

  1. Immediate Withdrawal from the ongoing nuclear peace talks.
  2. Total Abandonment of the prospective Nuclear Treaty framework.
  3. The Detonation of a Nuclear Device on Iranian soil—executed not as a weapon of war, but as an undeniable demonstration of sovereign capability and ultimate control over the escalation ladder.

When Marco Rubio was called an hour or so later by Pakistan’s Foreign Minister, Ishaq Dar, and received the same message, the White House knew that the information was legitimate. While the US intelligence community probably cannot confirm that Iran actually does have a functioning nuke, the Pakistanis believe the Iranians do. The intercepted chat between Pezeshkian and Shariff, followed by Rubio’s conversation with Ishaq Dar, convinced Trump and his advisors that Iran was not making a hollow threat.

Now we know why there has been a dramatic change in Trump’s rhetoric towards Iran… Hell, he downplayed yesterday’s missile dust up in the Persian Gulf, which left Kuwait’s International Airport on fire from an errant PAC3 Patriot missile.

I am very skeptical that nuclear weapons exist in the form we have been told that they do. Whether they don’t exist at all, which is what I think is the most probable state, or whether they simply aren’t stable to keep ready for more than a week or two, I don’t know. But I’m entirely confident that the whole concept of a “nuclear arsenal” that involves weapons being preserved in a metal shell and ready at the push of a button for decades is a fictional one.

So what Iran “possessing a nuclear weapon” actually signifies could mean that Iran is now willing to end the nuclear charade that ensured US military dominance for the last 70 years, and that it has the permission of China and Russia to do so.

This might explain the need for “alien disclosure” once the threat of nukes and global holocaust is gone.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Energy of the Old World

From a transcript of a video about Nikola Tesla’s missing last interview:

The question is not what Tesla believed about old buildings. The question is what he found in those buildings that convinced him. Tesla did not theorize in the abstract. He worked from measurement, experiment, physical demonstration. If he became convinced that Gothic cathedrals and neoclassical civic halls were electrical infrastructure, it was because he measured something inside them that standard architectural history does not explain.

What did he measure?

In 1934, Nikola Tesla traveled to Paris for a series of lectures on high-frequency electrical phenomena. While in the city, he requested access to Notre-Dame Cathedral — not to admire the rose windows or the flying buttresses. He wanted to examine the crypts and foundation level. The request was approved under the pretext of acoustical research. Tesla spent four hours below the cathedral, alone except for a custodian, examining limestone blocks and metal anchoring systems embedded in the foundation walls.

He returned to New York and immediately wrote to the Rockefeller Foundation requesting funding for what he called a comprehensive survey of pre-modern civic architecture across Europe and North America. The request was denied. No reason given.

But in private letters to Arthur Matthews, Tesla described what he had found beneath Notre-Dame: copper grounding systems embedded directly into the cathedral’s foundation blocks — not modern restorations added during 19th-century repairs, but original construction. Deliberately insulated with natural resins. Geometrically arranged in radial patterns extending outward from the central nave. Still conductive after six centuries.

Tesla called them earth batteries — passive electrical storage systems using the compression of stone, the mineralization of groundwater, and the conductivity of copper to create standing charges that could be drawn upon without fuel, without generation, without metering.

He described the design in technical terms. Mineral salts in the limestone acted as electrolytes. Copper plates functioned as electrodes. And the immense weight of the cathedral itself provided constant pressure to maintain the reaction. The system was not ornamental. It was functional. And it had been built into the foundation intentionally, at the time of original construction in the 12th century.

The Rockefeller Foundation was not interested. But Tesla did not stop.

Between 1935 and 1937, he submitted three technical papers to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. The papers were titled Observations on Pre-Industrial Conductive Infrastructure, Resonance Properties of Gothic Structural Design, and Evidence of Distributed Atmospheric Energy Collection in 18th Century Civic Buildings. None of them were published. All three were rejected with the same justification: the work was outside the scope of contemporary research.

That phrase deserves attention. Contemporary. They did not say Tesla’s findings were wrong. They did not say his measurements were faulty. They said the findings were not relevant to the current model of electrical distribution — which is accurate, if the current model depends on metered consumption and centralized generation. Tesla’s papers described systems that required neither. If those systems had existed, and if they had worked, then the entire infrastructure of the Second Industrial Revolution was not innovation. It was replacement — controlled, monetizable replacement.

Now step back and see who consolidated power during the Second Industrial Revolution, roughly 1870 to 1914. Westinghouse. Edison. General Electric. J.P. Morgan’s energy financing empire. All of them built monopolies on a single premise: that they had invented electrical distribution. That before them there was nothing. That the modern grid was the first time in human history that electricity had been harnessed at scale for public use.

If that premise was false — if large-scale electrical infrastructure had already existed in some form, even fragmented or misunderstood — then the Second Industrial Revolution was not a technological breakthrough. It was rebranding. Taking a lost or suppressed system, simplifying it, controlling it, and selling it back as progress.

During the 1950s, several European archives reported unexpected losses of construction documentation for major 18th-century civic projects.

The original architectural plans for Notre-Dame’s 19th-century restoration — which would have included detailed surveys of the medieval foundation — went missing from the French National Archives sometime between 1953 and 1956. The Gothic-era structural blueprints for Cologne Cathedral were reported lost in 1957. The subsurface construction records for the Panthéon in Paris were discovered to be incomplete in 1959, with all sections related to foundation metal work and grounding systems absent from the files.

Researchers at the time assumed poor recordkeeping, wartime damage, or routine archival decay. But the pattern is striking. The missing sections all relate to metal infrastructure and foundation systems. The decorative records, the liturgical plans, the iconographic surveys all survived intact. Only the technical construction details of subsurface and conductive elements were lost. And the losses occurred during the same decade that Tesla’s confiscated materials were being selectively retained and selectively destroyed.

The architecture of the pre-modern world is still visible. We walk past it daily. We preserve it, restore it, admire it. But we no longer recognize what it was built to do.

DISCUSS ON SG

Smells Like a False Flag

I kept seeing social media posts about how Iran had made a huge mistake by attacking a nuclear power plant in the UAE. Only there is no evidence that it was actually Iranian drones that targeted the plant:

The UAE said an unidentified drone struck the territory of its only nuclear power plant on Sunday amid ongoing tensions in the Middle East. According to the Emirati Defense Ministry, three drones entered the country “from the western border region.” While two UAVs were shot down, the third struck an electrical generator “outside the inner perimeter” of the Barakah Nuclear Power Plant in the Al Dhafra region. No injuries or radioactive contamination were reported.

While the Emirati authorities stopped short of directly accusing Iran, the country’s Foreign Ministry condemned the “unprovoked terrorist attack,” saying it threatened national security and risked further escalation.

Saudi Arabia said it intercepted three drones on the same day after they entered its airspace from Iraq.

If Iran decides it wants to go after the UAE’s nuclear power plant, it’s not going to use just three drones when it has hypersonic missiles in its arsenal. This was almost certainly a false flag, and the most likely candidate for raising one is pretty obvious.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Alien Hoax is Coming

Werner von Braun warned of this nearly 80 years ago.

Influential pastors are claiming that they have been told to prepare their followers for shocking revelations about UFOs which may upend belief in the Bible.

Perry Stone, a well-known evangelist, author and Bible teacher from Tennessee, warned that fellow pastors were recently invited to a secret meeting with US intelligence officials to prepare for the release of secret files on extraterrestrials.

According to Stone, the officials warned a small group of pastors with a large reach in the Christian community that the government was about to release reports and possibly videos of aliens and spacecraft which were not from this planet.

In the April 27 video posted to his YouTube channel, the evangelist claimed that pastors were told about the existence of ‘reptilian’ creatures, UFOs and materials from a non-human origin and ‘other things that almost sound like something out of a sci-fi movie.’

On February 19, President Trump ordered the Pentagon and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth to release all information the government possesses regarding UFOs and alien life. Last week, Trump said that the first files would be released ‘very, very soon’ and would contain some ‘very interesting’ things for the public.

You know it’s a psyop because they constantly talk about how this will somehow threaten the Christian faith. Which is absolutely absurd, given that Christianity literally requires the existence of beings from other dimensions interacting with humanity on the material plane.

The purpose of the revelation will be nefarious, of course, but what else is new on what is, after all, a fallen world. If they dislike the name of Jesus Christ, then it really doesn’t matter what they call themselves or where they say they’re from.

DISCUSS ON SG

Trump in the Epstein Files

Congressman Ted Lieu (D:CA): “Donald Trump is in the Epstein files thousands and thousands of times. In those files, there are highly disturbing allegations — allegations — of Donald Trump raping children and threatening to kill children.”

I could not be less interested in anyone from the Trump administration or professional Republican circles complaining about Democratic Party liars or pointing to past false accusations. There is a very easy way to prove that these accusations are false: release the Epstein files and documents and videos and pictures in their entirety.

Anything short of that is a) unacceptable and b) suspicious. No amount of evasion and explanation and justification is going to make this go away. If I was accused of such crimes, I wouldn’t even hesitate to put everything out there and make it absolutely clear who was guilty of these things and who was not.

Only the wicked need to hide in the dark.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Warning Shot

The disruption at the White House Correspondent’s Dinner last night looks less like a genuine assassination attempt and a lot more like a reminder to the Short Fat Trump that he’s expected to continue ordering the US military to fight Iran, not play diplomatic games and give the Islamic Republic more time to continue restocking its missile supplies.

A lot of observers were expecting things to kick off again this weekend. The “assassination attempt” may be an indication that they’re not going to do so.

DISCUSS ON SG