SC is too strong to defend herself:
Do you honestly believe you can look at just those two variables and draw substantive conclusions about them? Have you ever heard of globalization? The shift away from manufacturing and toward service industries? You really think that women in the workforce are causing your problems? Sounds like fear to me.
The entire problem on this blog is men who fear strong women. Fortunately I think most of the world is a little more rational. So you boys have fun blaming all your shortcomings on women and government – I have to go back to the real world now.”
Is anyone else surprised that SC is incapable of anything but yipping like a toy poodle? She has to make everything personal, so a discussion of average wage rates is suddenly transformed into a personal problem worthy of a pop psychoanalysis, mostly because that is the only field on which this “strong woman” is capable of engaging anyone.
Yes, one can look at just two variables and draw substantive conclusions about them when those two variables are Price and Supply. Globalization affects both supply and demand while service industry wages are not necessarily lower than manufacturing wages – who gets paid more per hour, a high-class prostitute in Switzerland or a shoe assembly-line worker in Vietnam? The fact that Demand (in the form of GDP growth) has skyrocketed only underlines the seriousness of the effect.
The idiocy of SC’s position is easily demonstrated, of course. Given that everyone rightly believes 21 million immigrants since 1970 have had a depressing effect on American wage rates, SC will find it very difficult to convince anyone with an IQ over 30 that 34 million women have been able to enter the labor force over the same period with absolutely no similar effect.
Run away, little girl. Run away and tell everyone how you scared the big bad mans.