It would seem that the venerable magazine the Economist really believes the global economic crisis is over, since it is now turning the focus of its formidable expertise from economics to climate science. And by climate science, I don’t mean the economic implications of the political policies of the eco-fascists in Copenhagen who are seeking to further cripple an already damaged global economy. No, the magazine has actually published an article attempting to examine the large difference between the raw data produced by Australian weather stations and the massaged version of that data subsequently published by the Global Historical Climate Network.