Nick Fuentes poses a philosophical exercise.
- Scenario A: You board a train car and see a black person, you immediately turn and leave— You’re a racist.
- Scenario B: You sit beside a black person and get stabbed to death— You’re dead.
- Scenario C: You fight back and subdue your attacker— You’re charged with manslaughter.
This exercise isn’t that hard, because racism isn’t bad, evil, wrong, or a sin. Racism is nothing more or less than the normal preference for the survival of one’s genetic kindred, culture, language, and religion, and opposing their destruction. That’s what it has meant since the term was first coined by General Richard Henry Pratt in 1902. The fact that the term has been twisted and redefined for rhetorical purposes doesn’t change what it actually and observably is.
Racism is even a Biblical and Christian virtue. See 1 Timothy 5:8.
But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.
Anti-racism is literally anti-Christian, as its reliably satanic fruits have proven over and over and over again. Let them call you whatever they want to call you, so long as you do what is right. Which, in this case, is obviously Scenario A. Because they’re going to call you racist no matter what you do, say, or even think to yourself, so long as you and your race of people survive with their identity intact.
“Segregating any class or race of people apart from the rest of the people kills the progress of the segregated people or hinders their growth. Association of races and classes is necessary to destroy racism and classism.”
—Richard Henry Pratt, 1902