The authors of the Narrative simply are not bringing their A game of late. If you’re going to try to admit the observable phenomenon of gangstalking but somehow absolve the responsible parties, trying to blame an activity that by its nature requires mass coordination on isolated individuals is risibly stupid, as AC points out.
I disagree with this idea of gangstalking as a morality play by individuals, the idea it is a rare phenomenon done by individuals, and its unrelatedness to the state. I have studied this extensively, writing the book American Stasi, and running the website at the dot-com domain of the same name, where I make the book available free. Gangstalking was a definite technique used by state security services, such as the East German Stasi, where it was actually a named operational technique called Zersetzung.
Today, we know our intelligence services in the west are wildly out of control. They have access to resources far beyond what the small communist East German intelligence services had access to, and as I show on my website, you can see the state surveillance machinery on Google Streetview of all places, and it extends even up to the wilds of Alaska.
We see accounts of gangstalking in the West going back to James Kennedy Toole in the fifties, and even authors like Phillip K Dick in the seventies, and Gloria Naylor in the nineties. The only difference today is that program has been expanded to average citizens.
It’s telling that the would-be gaslighter didn’t even hesitate to go right to what looks very much like Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim/Offender, which tends to raise some serious questions about why he’s so concerned about trying to convince people that anyone possessing even a modicum of pattern-recognition must be mentally ill. Anyhow, the gangstalking program is real, it’s an aspect of the surveillance state that Charles Stross and Robert Anton Wilson have described as the Panopticon, and it will be exposed sooner or later. I remember when those of us who knew the government was monitoring personal emails were supposed to be crazy too, until the FBI belatedly admitted the existence of its Carnivore program.
Carnivore, later renamed DCS1000, was a system implemented by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) that was designed to monitor email and electronic communications. It used a customizable packet sniffer that could monitor all of a target user’s Internet traffic. Carnivore was implemented in October 1997. By 2005 it had been replaced with improved commercial software.